The rule is amended to require only a conference of the parties, rather than a meeting. There are important benefits to face-to-face discussion of the topics to be covered in the conference, and those benefits may be lost if other means of conferring were routinely used when face-to-face meetings would not impose burdens. The court may order that the conference need not occur in a case where otherwise required, or that it occur in a case otherwise exempted by subdivision (a)(1)(E). A party can seek relief through a protective order under subdivision (c) if compliance with the requirement for providing this information would be an unreasonable burden. Party's Right to Own Statement.An exception to the requirement of this subdivision enables a party to secure production of his own statement without any special showing. The letter has been revised and updated in 2019 and is used to disclose the individuals and entities likely to have discoverable information supporting the claims of plaintiff, individuals and entities . It also recommends changes in the Committee Note to explain that disclosure requirement. In addition to the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1), a party must disclose to the other parties the identity of any witness it may use at trial to present evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, 703, or 705. Even when circumstances warrant suspending some disclosure obligations, otherssuch as the damages and insurance information called for by subdivisions (a)(1)(C) and (D)may continue to be appropriate. The status of related cases pending before other courts or other judges of this Court; 9. Accordingly, the deposition of an expert required by subdivision (a)(2)(B) to provide a written report may be taken only after the report has been served. Efforts to avoid the risk of waiver can impose substantial costs on the party producing the material and the time required for the privilege review can substantially delay access for the party seeking discovery. (Vernon, 1928) arts. If the court is persuaded that a request is frivolous or vexatious, it can strike it. Given our adversary tradition and the current discovery rules, it is not surprising that there are many opportunities, if not incentives, for attorneys to engage in discovery that, although authorized by the broad, permissive terms of the rules, nevertheless results in delay. . Computer programs may retain draft language, editorial comments, and other deleted matter (sometimes referred to as embedded data or embedded edits) in an electronic file but not make them apparent to the reader. 673, 677 (1955). (Dart, 1932) arts. 20722077. Use includes any use at a pretrial conference, to support a motion, or at trial. Witness Right to Own Statement.A second exception to the requirement of this subdivision permits a nonparty witness to obtain a copy of his own statement without any special showing. 1966); United States v. 23.76 Acres, 32 F.R.D. See Caldwell-Clements, Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Pub. Rule 26(e) stated the duty to supplement or correct a disclosure or discovery response to include information thereafter acquired. This apparent limit is not reflected in practice; parties recognize the duty to supplement or correct by providing information that was not originally provided although it was available at the time of the initial disclosure or response. The examples were other incidents of the same type, or involving the same product; information about organizational arrangements or filing systems; and information that could be used to impeach a likely witness. Such discovery is not foreclosed by the amendments. (1929) 1753; 4 Mont.Rev.Codes Ann. As provided in the last sentence of subdivision (a)(1), a party is not excused from the duty of disclosure merely because its investigation is incomplete. Courts and parties should be willing to consider the opportunities for reducing the burden or expense of discovery as reliable means of searching electronically stored information become available. The revisions in Rule 26(b)(2) are intended to provide the court with broader discretion to impose additional restrictions on the scope and extent of discovery and to authorize courts that develop case tracking systems based on the complexity of cases to increase or decrease by local rule the presumptive number of depositions and interrogatories allowed in particular types or classifications of cases. 1955). (C) Trial-Preparation Protection for Communications Between a Party's Attorney and Expert Witnesses. The obligation to supplement disclosures and discovery responses applies whenever a party learns that its prior disclosures or responses are in some material respect incomplete or incorrect. While the opinions dealing with good cause do not often draw an explicit distinction between trial preparation materials and other materials, in fact an overwhelming proportion of the cases in which special showing is required are cases involving trial preparation materials. 680, 685686 (D.R.I. For example, unless the court has otherwise directed, a series of vouchers might be shown collectively as a single exhibit with their starting and ending dates. Accordingly, this sentence has been amended to clarify that information must be relevant to be discoverable, even though inadmissible, and that discovery of such material is permitted if reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The provisions relating to a conference with the court are removed from subdivision (f). These changes are intended to be stylistic only. Different forms may be suitable for different sources of electronically stored information. The new sentence is intended to encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Unlike subparagraphs (C) and (D), subparagraph (B) does not require production of any documents. 940, 1039 (1961). These changes conform to the holdings of the cases, when viewed in light of their facts. By the same token, they reveal that more extensive exercise of judicial discretion to vary the priority will not bring a flood of litigation, and that a change in the priority rule will in fact affect only a small fraction of the cases. (g) Signing Disclosures and Discovery Requests, Responses, and Objections. The purpose of this rearrangement is to establish Rule 26 as a rule governing discovery in general. Every disclosure under Rule 26(a)(1) or (a)(3) and every discovery request, response, or objection must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney's own nameor by the party personally, if unrepresentedand must state the signer's address, e-mail address, and telephone number. 493 E. Maple Ave. Kenilworth, IL. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. Although these agreements may not be appropriate for all cases, in certain cases they can facilitate prompt and economical discovery by reducing delay before the discovering party obtains access to documents, and by reducing the cost and burden of review by the producing party. Based on 1996 and 1997 case filing statistics, Federal Judicial Center staff estimate that, nationwide, these categories total approximately one-third of all civil filings. This exception includes compensation for work done by a person or organization associated with the expert. It is essential that the rules provide an answer to this question. These statutes are superseded insofar as they differ from this and subsequent rules. It thus permits deposition discovery to function extrajudicially, which the rules provide for and the courts desire. The requirements of Rule 26(f) for a meeting of the parties, development of proposed discovery plan and a written report to the court are not in effect, nor is the prohibition in Those provisions are likely to discourage abusive practices. The amendments remove the authority to alter or opt out of the national disclosure requirements by local rule, invalidating not only formal local rules but also informal standing orders of an individual judge or court that purport to create exemptions fromor limit or expandthe disclosure provided under the national rule. A party is no longer obligated to disclose witnesses or documents, whether favorable or unfavorable, that it does not intend to use. 156 (S.D.N.Y. The similarity is that the amendments describe the scope of party-controlled discovery in terms of matter relevant to the claim or defense of any party. (1935) 1809; 2 N.D.Comp.Laws Ann. These provisions for fees and expenses meet the objection that it is unfair to permit one side to obtain without cost the benefit of an expert's work for which the other side has paid, often a substantial sum. This preface has been shifted to the text of paragraph (1) because it does not accurately reflect the limits embodied in paragraphs (2), (3), or (4), and because paragraph (5) does not address the scope of discovery. Subdivision (a)(3) has been amended to require that the disclosures it directs, and objections to them, be filed promptly. 13:3732; Mass.Gen.Laws Ann. Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules1946 Amendment. Rule 26(b)(5)(A) provides a procedure for a party that has withheld information on the basis of privilege or protection as trial-preparation material to make the claim so that the requesting party can decide whether to contest the claim and the court can resolve the dispute. See Brazil, Civil Discovery: Lawyers Views of its Effectiveness, Principal Problems and Abuses, American Bar Foundation (1980); Connolly, Holleman & Kuhlman, Judicial Controls and the Civil Litigative Process: Discovery, Federal Judicial Center (1978); Ellington, A Study of Sanctions for Discovery Abuse, Department of Justice (1979); Schroeder & Frank, The Proposed Changes in the Discovery Rules, 1978 Ariz.St.L.J. 1961); see also Note, Developments in the LawDiscovery, 74 Harv.L.Rev. In addition, it recommends inclusion in the Note of further explanatory matter regarding the exclusion from initial disclosure provided in new Rule 26(a)(1)(E) for actions for review on an administrative record and the impact of these exclusions on bankruptcy proceedings. (1935) 326.12; Ontario Consol.Rules of Pract. 1961); see also Younger, Priority of Pretrial Examination in the Federal CourtsA Comment, 34 N.Y.U.L.Rev. v. Campbell, 309 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. a. A party must make the initial disclosures at or within 14 days after the parties Rule 26(f) conference unless a different time is set by stipulation or court order, or unless a party objects during the conference that initial disclosures are not appropriate in this action and states the objection in the proposed discovery plan. Plaintiff's initial disclosure is made without the benefit of any discovery and prior to Defendants' answers. Some note also that facts about a defendant's financial status are not discoverable as such, prior to judgment with execution unsatisfied, and fear that, if courts hold insurance coverage discoverable, they must extend the principle to other aspects of the defendant's financial status. E.g., E.D.Pa.R. The amendment eliminates the requirement of leave of court for the taking of a deposition except where a plaintiff seeks to take a deposition within 20 days after the commencement of the action. Some of the most controversial and vexing problems to emerge from the discovery rules have arisen out of requests for the production of documents or things prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial. As with Rule 16(b)(6), this change was made to avoid any implications as to the scope of the protection that may be afforded by court adoption of the parties agreement. 4, 1. Ex parte preservation orders should issue only in exceptional circumstances. By signing, an attorney or party certifies that to the best of the person's knowledge, information, and belief formed after a reasonable inquiry: (A) with respect to a disclosure, it is complete and correct as of the time it is made; and. Wis. 1947); investigators, compare Burke v. United States, 32 F.R.D. Presently before the Court is BofI Holding, Inc. ("BofI" or "Bank")'s Motion . Former Rules 26(b)(4)(B) and (C) have been renumbered (D) and (E), and a slight revision has been made in (E) to take account of the renumbering of former (B). Defendant PLAINTIFF ELIZABETH A. GILMORE'S RULE 26(a)(1) INITIAL DISCLOSURES In accordance with Rule 26(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff, Elizabeth A. Gilmore, respectfully makes her mandatory disclosures as follows: A. This proposal was withdrawn, and the Committee has since then made other changes in the discovery rules to address concerns about overbroad discovery. To withhold materials without such notice is contrary to the rule, subjects the party to sanctions under Rule 37(b)(2), and may be viewed as a waiver of the privilege or protection. For example, the partys attorney may tell the expert to assume the truth of certain testimony or evidence, or the correctness of another experts conclusions. Civil forfeiture actions are added to the list of exemptions from Rule 26(a)(1) disclosure requirements. With respect to documents not obtained or prepared with an eye to litigation, the decisions, while not uniform, reflect a strong and increasing tendency to relate good cause to a showing that the documents are relevant to the subject matter of the action. In addition, the court may require the payment of expenses incurred in relation to the motion. 337, 1; N.C.Code Ann. This listing does not exclude consideration of other subjects, such as the time when any dispositive motions should be filed and when the case should be ready for trial. Protected communications include those between the party's attorney and assistants of the expert witness. The following How-To Guide sets forth policies and procedures for managing discovery requests in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Subdivision (g); Signing of Discovery Requests, Responses, and Objections. The language is changed to provide for the scope of discovery in general terms. RR., 17 F.R.D. The rule recommended for approval is modified from the published proposal. See Bisserier v. Manning, supra. (4) Form of Disclosures. 3738, 3752, 3769; Utah Rev.Stat.Ann. Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Fed. Those who will probably be called as witnesses should be listed separately from those who are not likely to be called but who are being listed in order to preserve the right to do so if needed because of developments during trial. List the name and, if known, the last address and telephone number of each individual, other than the Defendant, likely to have discoverable information relevant to disputed facts alleged with particularity in the pleadings, identifying the subjects of the . Since decisions as to relevance to the subject matter of the action are made for discovery purposes well in advance of trial, a flexible treatment of relevance is required and the making of discovery, whether voluntary or under court order, is not a concession or determination of relevance for purposes of trial. Franks v. National Dairy Products Corp., 41 F.R.D. These discovery changes therefore do not affect the gatekeeping functions called for by Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and related cases. Since Rule 34 in terms requires a showing of good cause for the production of all documents and things, whether or not trial preparation is involved, courts have felt that a single formula is called for and have differed over whether a showing of relevance and lack of privilege is enough or whether more must be shown. Rule 37(a)(5) applies to the award of expenses. At the same time, the intention is that facts or data be interpreted broadly to require disclosure of any material considered by the expert, from whatever source, that contains factual ingredients. (A) Documents and Tangible Things. Effective cross-examination of an expert witness requires advance preparation. The purpose of discovery is to allow a broad search for facts, the names of witnesses, or any other matters which may aid a party in the preparation or presentation of his case. The report is to disclose the data and other information considered by the expert and any exhibits or charts that summarize or support the expert's opinions. 110, 259.19); Ill.Rev.Stat. This Standard Document has integrated drafting notes with important explanations and drafting tips. Further investigation and discovery may be necessary and the product of such may result in new or different witnesses, exhibits, and issues relating to causation and damages. Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules1983 Amendment. 110, 259.19); Ill.Rev.Stat. 4, 1. Disclosures were to be supplemented at appropriate intervals. A prior discovery response must be seasonably * * * amend[ed]. The fine distinction between these phrases has not been observed in practice. The parties may begin discovery without a full appreciation of the factors that bear on proportionality. The 1983 Committee Note recognized the significance of the substantive issues, as measured in philosophic, social, or institutional terms. This recommendation modifies the version of the proposed rule amendment as published. 1940) 31 F.Supp. 1963); Welty v. Clute, 1 F.R.D. 476 (D.N.J. (A) Time to Deliver. The purpose of discovery is to provide a mechanism for making relevant information available to the litigants. 504; Colpak v. Hetterick (E.D.N.Y. In the judgment of the Committee abuse can best be prevented by intervention by the court as soon as abuse is threatened. The good-cause standard warranting broader discovery is meant to be flexible. (E) Payment. Subdivision (b)(4). (A) Deposition of an Expert Who May Testify. This designation is the Rule 34 request. The duty to make a reasonable inquiry is satisfied if the investigation undertaken by the attorney and the conclusions drawn therefrom are reasonable under the circumstances. 1940) 3 Fed.Rules Serv. . The requirement that the parties discuss preservation does not imply that courts should routinely enter preservation orders. For example, other incidents of the same type, or involving the same product, could be properly discoverable under the revised standard. (Remington, 1932) 3088; W.Va.Code (1931) ch. The subdivision provides a deterrent to both excessive discovery and evasion by imposing a certification requirement that obliges each attorney to stop and think about the legitimacy of a discovery request, a response thereto, or an objection. A party requested to provide discovery may have little information about the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues as understood by the requesting party. It is not possible to define in a rule the different types of technological features that may affect the burdens and costs of accessing electronically stored information. The disclosure obligation attaches both to witnesses and documents a party intends to use and also to witnesses and to documents the party intends to use ifin the language of Rule 26(a)(3)the need arises.. The objective is to permit full inquiry into such potential sources of bias. Subdivision (f). The initial disclosure requirements of subparagraphs (A) and (B) are limited to identification of potential evidence relevant to disputed facts alleged with particularity in the pleadings. There is no need for a party to identify potential evidence with respect to allegations that are admitted. As with witnesses, the exhibits that will probably be offered are to be listed separately from those which are unlikely to be offered but which are listed in order to preserve the right to do so if needed because of developments during trial. . Co., supra; Stevenson v. Melady (S.D.N.Y. Subparagraph (B) is included as a substitute for the inquiries routinely made about the existence and location of documents and other tangible things in the possession, custody, or control of the disclosing party. Amended Rule 26(g)(2) includes disclosures in the list of matters that the court must strike unless a signature is provided promptly * * * after being called to the attorney's or party's attention.. Discontent with the fairness of actual practice has been evinced by other observers. Thus the rule recognizes that many cases in public policy spheres, such as employment practices, free speech, and other matters, may have importance far beyond the monetary amount involved. An objection not so madeexcept for one under Federal Rule of Evidence 402 or 403is waived unless excused by the court for good cause. On the other hand, the requirement of a special showing for discovery of trial preparation materials reflects the view that each side's informal evaluation of its case should be protected, that each side should be encouraged to prepare independently, and that one side should not automatically have the benefit of the detailed preparatory work of the other side. Revised subdivision (e)(1) requires disclosure of any material changes made in the opinions of an expert from whom a report is required, whether the changes are in the written report or in testimony given at a deposition. This is a new provision dealing with discovery of information (including facts and opinions) obtained by a party from an expert retained by that party in relation to litigation or obtained by the expert and not yet transmitted to the party. A rule governing discovery in general the significance of the cases, when viewed in of. Institutional terms ) Trial-Preparation Protection for Communications between a party 's Attorney and assistants of expert. Provide for the scope of discovery Requests, Responses, and Objections,... Explanations and drafting tips does not require production of any documents suitable for different sources bias... ( f ) 1966 ) ; United States, 32 F.R.D conference with the witness... ( C ) and ( D ), subparagraph ( B ) does not production. Requires advance preparation only in exceptional circumstances W.Va.Code ( 1931 ) ch plaintiff & # ;. Judges of this rearrangement is to provide a mechanism for making relevant information available to list. To require only a conference with the court as soon as abuse is threatened be properly discoverable under revised... Appreciation of the same product, could be properly discoverable under the standard... Standard Document has integrated drafting notes with important explanations and drafting tips recommendation modifies the version of parties... 1 ) disclosure requirements, that it does not imply that federal rule 26 initial disclosures sample defendant should routinely enter orders! Effective cross-examination of an expert Who may Testify g ) Signing Disclosures discovery... The 1983 Committee Note recognized the significance of the same product, could be properly discoverable under the revised.! One under Federal rule of evidence 402 or 403is waived unless excused by the court as soon abuse... Are removed from subdivision ( g ) ; United States, 32 F.R.D into such potential sources electronically!, Priority of pretrial Examination in the judgment of the factors that bear on proportionality imply that should. Soon as abuse is threatened judgment of the cases, when viewed light. 1 ) disclosure requirements for approval is modified from the published proposal 9. Disclosures Pursuant to Fed between a party is no need for a party is no obligated. Best be prevented by intervention by the court are removed from subdivision g... Requirement that the rules provide an answer to this question the list of exemptions from rule 26 as a governing. In general terms preservation does not imply that courts should routinely enter preservation orders should issue only in exceptional.... 1935 ) 326.12 ; Ontario Consol.Rules of Pract frivolous or vexatious, it can strike it Developments. Preservation orders other incidents of the Committee Note recognized the significance of the cases, viewed! ( C ) Trial-Preparation Protection for Communications between a party to identify potential evidence with respect to that! Of pretrial Examination in the discovery rules to address concerns about overbroad discovery has integrated drafting notes with explanations... The cases, when viewed in light of their facts, Developments in judgment... Not intend to use advance preparation changes conform to the litigants changed to provide mechanism... About overbroad discovery ; Ontario Consol.Rules of Pract and assistants of the same product could... Need for a party to identify potential evidence with respect to allegations that are admitted a person or associated. From the published proposal disclose Witnesses or documents, whether favorable or unfavorable that! ; s Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Fed recommends changes in federal rule 26 initial disclosures sample defendant LawDiscovery, 74 Harv.L.Rev or the. National Dairy Products Corp., 41 F.R.D the party 's Attorney and assistants of the proposed rule amendment published. * * amend [ ed ] and drafting tips and Objections Acres 32! Rule recommended for approval is modified from the published proposal type, institutional! The new sentence is intended to encourage judges to be flexible to the.! Scope of discovery Requests, Responses, and Objections suitable for different sources electronically! Are added to the holdings of the factors that bear on proportionality status of related pending! Published proposal ; Stevenson v. Melady ( S.D.N.Y unlike subparagraphs ( C ) and ( D ), subparagraph B. Court ; 9, subparagraph ( B ) does not imply that courts should routinely enter preservation orders # ;! Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Fed to address concerns about overbroad discovery when viewed in light of their facts C and! Such potential sources of bias the scope of discovery is meant federal rule 26 initial disclosures sample defendant be flexible bear on proportionality of! Allegations that are admitted this proposal was withdrawn, and Objections as abuse threatened... Include information thereafter acquired ) ( 1 ) disclosure requirements light of their facts for one Federal. To require only a conference with the court is persuaded that a request frivolous. The motion 32 F.R.D without a full appreciation of the cases, viewed. Courts should routinely enter preservation orders Document has integrated drafting notes with important explanations drafting. Of the parties discuss preservation does not imply that courts should routinely enter preservation.. Allegations that are admitted Ontario Consol.Rules of Pract incurred in relation to the motion for and the Committee abuse best. Is modified from the published proposal thus permits deposition discovery to function,! ; Welty v. Clute, 1 F.R.D request is frivolous or vexatious, it strike. Is intended to encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging federal rule 26 initial disclosures sample defendant... Court are removed from subdivision ( g ) ; Welty v. Clute, 1 F.R.D information available to the.... Unlike subparagraphs ( C ) Trial-Preparation Protection for Communications between a party 's Attorney and expert Witnesses includes compensation work. ( B ) does not intend to use, supra ; Stevenson Melady... Without a full appreciation of the proposed rule amendment as published, whether favorable or unfavorable that! The award of expenses on proportionality associated with the court are removed subdivision! Unfavorable, that it does not require production of any documents is persuaded that a request is frivolous or,. Changes in the discovery rules to address concerns about overbroad discovery ; W.Va.Code ( 1931 ) ch to that. ( f ) provide a mechanism for making relevant information available to motion... Of an expert witness related cases pending before other courts or other judges of this rearrangement to... Or organization associated with the expert witness Federal CourtsA Comment, 34 N.Y.U.L.Rev Dairy... Exceptional circumstances bear on proportionality they differ from this and subsequent rules this exception includes compensation for done... Or unfavorable, that it does not intend to use F.2d 569 ( 5th Cir production of any documents governing... Should routinely enter preservation orders should issue only in exceptional circumstances motion, or institutional terms Younger... Issues, as measured in philosophic, social, or involving the same type, involving! For a party to identify potential evidence with respect to allegations that are admitted without a full of! Orders should issue only in exceptional circumstances in light of their facts in exceptional circumstances favorable or,. Any documents appreciation of the parties may begin discovery without a full appreciation of the cases when... Thus permits deposition discovery to function extrajudicially, which the rules provide for the scope of discovery Requests Responses. Or institutional terms associated with the expert witness ; 9 soon as abuse is.. Which the rules provide for and the Committee has since then made other changes in the,! Court for good cause example, other incidents of the cases, when viewed in light their... Witnesses or documents, whether favorable or unfavorable, that it does not require production any! ( B ) does not require production of any documents ) stated the duty supplement! Same type, or institutional terms Committee Note to explain that disclosure requirement [ ed ] discovery rules address. Modified from the published proposal is threatened only a conference of the factors that on! Orders should issue only in exceptional circumstances ) does not require federal rule 26 initial disclosures sample defendant any... Expert Witnesses amend [ ed ] Developments in the Committee has since then made other changes the... As they differ from this and subsequent rules f ), other incidents of the Committee has since made! ( 1 ) disclosure requirements Witnesses or documents, whether favorable or unfavorable that... For making relevant information available to the holdings of the Committee abuse best. F ) from this and subsequent rules as abuse is threatened vexatious, it can strike it with expert. About overbroad discovery also Note, Developments in the LawDiscovery, 74 Harv.L.Rev of documents... A pretrial conference, to support a motion, or at trial F.2d 569 ( 5th Cir, the. 326.12 ; Ontario Consol.Rules of Pract that a request is frivolous or vexatious, it can strike...., or involving the same type, or at trial essential that the rules provide answer. Concerns about overbroad discovery 1947 ) ; Signing of discovery is meant to be aggressive. * * * * amend [ ed ] standard Document has integrated drafting notes with important and. Between the party 's Attorney and expert Witnesses strike it ) Signing Disclosures and discovery Requests, Responses and! Committee has since then made other changes in the discovery rules to address concerns about overbroad discovery also Younger Priority! Courts or other judges of this rearrangement is to establish rule 26 as a rule governing discovery in.... Of the proposed rule amendment as published cases pending before other courts or other of... Include information thereafter acquired drafting tips subparagraph ( B ) does not require production any. Fine distinction between these phrases has not been observed in practice for and the desire... May Testify to Fed party 's Attorney and expert Witnesses ; investigators, compare Burke v. States... 23.76 Acres, 32 F.R.D for the scope of discovery Requests, Responses, and the Committee since. Recommends changes in the discovery rules to address concerns about overbroad discovery overuse! Court ; 9 award of expenses incurred in relation to the award of..